Document Type : Articles

Author

Scientific Research Center, Soran University, Soran, Iraq

Abstract

Severe water scarcity has occurred in the Erbil Basin (EB) due to climate change and mismanagement of water resources during the past three decades. Assessment of the potential area of groundwater recharge is extremely significant for the protection and management of groundwater systems and water quality. This research aims to use the Fuzzy-Analytic Hierarchy Process (F-AHP) technique to recharge the aquifer in places in the EB that are likely to be groundwater recharge areas in a geographic information system (GIS) environment. GIS, remote sensing (RS), and F-AHP techniques were used to map the groundwater recharge potential zone in EB. Eight different geo-environmental factors were used to determine potential groundwater areas, namely: rainfall, lithology, geology, soil, slope, lineament density, land use/land cover (LULC), and drainage density (Dd). Then, the weights of the different thematic layers were assigned using a pairwise comparison matrix through the F-AHP. The total groundwater potential zone was shown to cover a very high area of 210.85 square kilometers (km2), a high area of 188.94 km2, a moderate area of 573.06 km2, a low area of 1956.48 km2, and a very low area of 216.34 km2, according to the groundwater recharge potential zones (GWRPZs) map. As a result, nearly one-third of the areas investigated were found to have moderate-to-very high groundwater recharge potential. This type of research can provide decision-makers and local governments with a broad perspective on current and future planning for groundwater scarcity.

Keywords

  1. Al-Ansari, N. (2021). Water Resources of Iraq. Journal of Earth Sciences and Geotechnical Engineering, 11(2), 15-34.
  2. Al-Ansari, N., Essaid, H., & Salim, Y. (1981). Water resources in Iraq.
  3. Al-Tamir, A. (2008). Interpretation of ground water quality data variation in Erbil city, Northern Iraq. Al-Rafidain Engineering Journal (AREJ), 16(2), 24-30.
  4. Alpagut, B., Lopez Romo, A., Hernandez, P., Tabanoğlu, O., & Hermoso Martinez, N. (2021). A GIS-Based Multicriteria Assessment for Identification of Positive Energy Districts Boundary in Cities. Energies, 14(22), 7517.
  5. Buckley, J. J. (1985). Fuzzy hierarchical analysis. Fuzzy sets and Systems, 17(3), 233-247.
  6. Carrard, N., Foster, T., & Willetts, J. (2020). Correction: Groundwater as a source of drinking water in southeast asia and the pacific: A multi-country review of current reliance and resource concerns.[Water (2019), 11,(1605. Water (Switzerland).
  7. Çelik, R. (2019). Evaluation of groundwater potential by GIS-based multicriteria decision making as a spatial prediction tool: case study in the Tigris River Batman-Hasankeyf Sub-Basin, Turkey. Water, 11(12), 2630.
  8. Chen, G., Pham, T. T., & Boustany, N. (2001). Introduction to fuzzy sets, fuzzy logic, and fuzzy control systems. Appl. Mech. Rev., 54(6), B102-B103.
  9. Cobbing, J., Adams, S., Dennis, I., & Riemann, K. (2013). Assessing and managing groundwater in different environments: CRC Press.
  10. El-Din, H. K., Abd El Munim, H. E., & Mahdi, H. (2019). Decision-Making in Fuzzy Environment: A Survey. Application of Decision Science in Business and Management, 15.
  11. Ghaib, F. (2009). The Assessment of Erbil Aquifer Using Geo-electrical Investigation (Iraqi Kurdistan Region). Journal of applied sciences in environmental sanitation, 4(1), 43-54.
  12. Hassan, W. H., Nile, B. K., Mahdi, K., Wesseling, J., & Ritsema, C. (2021). A feasibility assessment of potential artificial recharge for increasing agricultural areas in the kerbala desert in iraq using numerical groundwater modeling. Water, 13(22), 3167.
  13. Ho, W. (2008). Integrated analytic hierarchy process and its applications–A literature review. European Journal of operational research, 186(1), 211-228.
  14. Kumar, M., Singh, P., & Singh, P. (2021). Fuzzy AHP based GIS and Remote Sensing Techniques for the Groundwater Potential Zonation for Bundelkhand Craton Region, India. Geocarto International(just-accepted), 1-21.
  15. Kznee, A. (1997). Erbil and drinking water in the past and the present, the Ministry of Education. Erbil, 29.
  16. Lee, S. K., Mogi, G., & Hui, K. (2013). A fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (AHP)/data envelopment analysis (DEA) hybrid model for efficiently allocating energy R&D resources: In the case of energy technologies against high oil prices. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 21, 347-355.
  17. Mentes, A., & Helvacioglu, I. H. (2011). Review of fuzzy set theory applications in safety assessment for marine and offshore industries. Paper presented at the International Conference on Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering.
  18. Nagarajan, R., & Thirunavukarasu, R. (2019). A fuzzy-based decision-making broker for effective identification and selection of cloud infrastructure services. Soft Computing, 23(19), 9669-9683.
  19. Neff, B. P., Rosenberry, D. O., Leibowitz, S. G., Mushet, D. M., Golden, H. E., Rains, M. C., . . . Lane, C. R. (2020). A hydrologic landscapes perspective on groundwater connectivity of depressional wetlands. Water, 12(1), 50.
  20. NGUYEN, P.-H. (2021). A Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process (FAHP) Based on SERVQUAL for Hotel Service Quality Management: Evidence from Vietnam. The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics, and Business, 8(2), 1101-1109.
  21. Noughabi, E. A. Z., Raahemi, B., Albadvi, A., & Far, B. H. (2017). Handbook of research on data science for effective healthcare practice and administration: IGI Global.
  22. Reig-Mullor, J., Pla-Santamaria, D., & Garcia-Bernabeu, A. (2020). Extended fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (E-fahp): A general approach. Mathematics, 8(11), 2014.
  23. Saaty, T. L. (1980). The analytic hierarchy process (AHP). The Journal of the Operational Research Society, 41(11), 1073-1076.
  24. Saleh, S. A., Al-Ansari, N., & Abdullah, T. (2020). Groundwater Hydrology in Iraq. Journal of Earth Sciences and Geotechnical Engineering, 10(1), 155-197.
  25. Scanlon, B. R., Keese, K. E., Flint, A. L., Flint, L. E., Gaye, C. B., Edmunds, W. M., & Simmers, I. (2006). Global synthesis of groundwater recharge in semiarid and arid regions. Hydrological Processes: An International Journal, 20(15), 3335-3370.
  26. Shah, R. A., & Lone, S. A. (2019). Hydrogeomorphological mapping using geospatial techniques for assessing the groundwater potential of Rambiara river basin, western Himalayas. Applied Water Science, 9(3), 1-11.
  27. Shao, Z., Huq, M. E., Cai, B., Altan, O., & Li, Y. (2020). Integrated remote sensing and GIS approach using Fuzzy-AHP to delineate and identify groundwater potential zones in semi-arid Shanxi Province, China. Environmental Modelling & Software, 134, 104868.
  28. Shekha, Y. A. (2016). Evaluation of water quality for Greater Zab River by principal component analysis/factor analysis. Iraqi Journal of Science, 57(4B), 2650-2663.
  29. Sridharan, M., Jayaprakash, G., Chandrasekar, M., Vigneshwar, P., Paramaguru, S., & Amarnath, K. (2018). Prediction of solar photovoltaic/thermal collector power output using fuzzy logic. Journal of Solar Energy Engineering, 140(6).
  30. Stevanovic, Z., & Iurkiewicz, A. (2009). Groundwater management in northern Iraq. Hydrogeology journal, 17(2), 367-378.
  31. Tiwary, U. (2009). Fuzzy Sets (Type-1 and Type-2) and their Applications.
  32. Vafaei, N., Ribeiro, R. A., & Camarinha-Matos, L. M. (2016). Normalization techniques for multi-criteria decision making: analytical hierarchy process case study. Paper presented at the doctoral conference on computing, electrical and industrial systems.
  33. Winter, T. C. (1999). Ground water and surface water: a single resource (Vol. 1139): Diane Publishing.